09/02/10 February Competition: win a Free Nelson Mandela T-Shirt 08/02/10 New debate announced - Osbornomics: what will the Conservatives do to the economy? 08/02/10 New debate announced - Unequal Britain: time for a High Pay Commission? 05/02/10 130 MPs sign EDM 191 & call for High Pay Commission 03/02/10 Helena Kennedy: Let's replicate our success!

Compass poll

Latest comments
  • Soon after contacting Joe Cox the Campaign Manager for Compass, he has confirmed that they are suppo...
    Harry Barnes (Dronfield)
  • Again this is preaching to the converted on these pages....
    Brian Lynch
  • Colin : I notice that along with over 40 other Labour MPs, you signed the statement issued by the "C...
    Harry Barnes (Dronfield)
  • It is all very well saying that Labour must not tack to the Right....
    Paul McLean (Leeds)
  • Brian,Katie Price could easily become a tenured university professor....
    Lewis Parry (Elx)
Mailing list
Join Compass
High Pay Commission
No Turning Back
How to live in the 21st Century
News filter

Wes Streeting outlines a blueprint for an alternative to top up fees

Wednesday, June 10 2009

The last twelve years have seen the steady introduction of destructive market forces into our higher education system, culminating today with the demand by some for the cap on tuition fees to be removed so that different institutions can charge different fees.

We should be in no doubt - this means the wealthiest and most socially exclusive institutions will get more, and the rest will suffer. The first generation of students to be charged top-up fees will graduate this summer, saddled with debt and entering the worst labour market in decades. If university vice-chancellors get their way, then tomorrow's students will pay between £4,000 and £20,000 in fees for each year in which they study.

Meanwhile, the independent review of top up fees will begin imminently. The newly reshuffled Government must now listen to the voice of those who use and now pay for higher education - students - and ensure that the review of fees and funding will consider more equitable and sustainable alternatives to top-up fees. The forthcoming review must not simply ask the question of ‘the cap: how high?' but should find a lasting solution to enable those who want to access higher education to do so without penalising them by generating bad debts for them and the country.

We have been challenged to propose a better solution to the market logic of variable fees. The NUS Funding Our Future blueprint does just that. Our proposals would end the very notion of a course fee or price, shut the door on a market in fees and end tuition debt. We propose that graduates contribute to the future costs of higher education according to their actual future earnings, so that those who benefit the most from university by earning more will contribute more in order to give future students access to higher education. We define this as a progressive approach. This graduate contribution would be paid into an independent fund - a People's Trust for higher education - which would be built up over time and eventually deliver considerable additional resources to the universities and students of the future.

By abolishing all up front fees for part-time students and establishing credit-related payment, our system would initiate a new era for non-traditional learning and continuing education through life, allowing individuals to move in and out of the higher education system without penalty.

We believe our proposals should be seen as proof that a viable alternative to top up fees could be found. We encourage those in power to use their imaginations to consider what a genuinely progressive higher education funding system might look like, and how it could be turned into a reality to ensure equity and sustainability for generations of students to come.

Wes Streeting, President, NUS

NUS will be hosting a fringe at Compass Conference on Saturday 13 June at 11.15am with Jon Cruddas MP entitled 'Generation debt - what should be done?' as the first top-up fee generation prepares to graduate from university this summer and the number of unemployed under-25 fast approaches 1 million. Join us to discuss progressive solutions to this mountaing crisis.

Share using AddThis AddThis

Want to write an article like this? If you’re a Compass member you can submit your own articles and start your own debates on the Compass debates member’s section, an autonomous space for our members to initiate debate and discuss ideas.

To keep updated on the latest Compass news, please join our mailing list.

Comments

  • ««
  • «
  • »
  • »»
1 to 5 of 5
Posted by ben (welshpool)
on 13 June 2009, 11:10:39 PM
the argument that high earners would move abroad is irrelevent if you make it a private contract with the university not a state based tax. say a student has to contribute x amount of money (inflation tracking?) to the uni and has 30 years (or any reasonabley long time) to pay it off with the government willing to make up the shortfall.
Posted by Dugsie (Yorks)
on 11 June 2009, 4:10:33 PM
When I was a kid we left school at 15. One of my brothers left at 14 and my father at 13. Has all this education improved our democracy ?
Posted by Salfordgal (London)
on 11 June 2009, 3:46:02 PM
Call me self indulgent if you will, but isn't this one of the reasons why God invented progressive taxation?
Posted by Jon (york)
on 11 June 2009, 3:44:05 PM
and when the truly wealthy (foe example bankers) move their jobs beyond the reach of the British tax payer those working for thier local council with their degrees in social work get to pay extra to subsidise the tax refusniks.


back to the drawing board I think.
Posted by Andrew Pope (Southampton)
on 11 June 2009, 8:47:29 AM
This is a very interesting idea and is truly a progressive approach. The only questions I would ask would be: 1. Whilst the fund is building up, how would any shortfall be addressed? 2. How confident are you that the electorate would support such a policy?

  • ««
  • «
  • »
  • »»
1 to 5 of 5

 

Leave a comment

About you










Your comment

Please do not use HTML tags in your comment as they will be displayed as normal text.

We take no responsibility for the content of comments posted on this website, which represent the views of their authors alone.

Please enter the two words in the image below. This is an anti-spam measure designed to prove that you are a human, not a computer.