09/07/10 Lessons from Deepwater Horizon 23/06/10 A New Hope: full YouTube coverage now available 02/06/10 Latest Thinkpiece published 26/05/10 A New Hope for Labour: attend the Leaders' Debate 19/05/10 A New Hope: Caroline Lucas MP confirms to speak‏

Compass poll

Latest comments
  • Dianne deserves support not so much because of what she is, but because of what she isn't....
    Dugsie (Yorks)
  • Jonathan: I dont actually disagree with your verdict about Abbott....
    Lee (Highlands)
  • Paul: I hope you dont get angry, but I really think you are treating what Rutherford says far too se...
    Lee (Highlands)
  • Lee - she's got the support of just 2 Trade Unions and 20 CLP's - she has very little support in the...
    Jonathon Hawkes
  • Lewis, I am pleased that your idealism about Labour has dimmed somewhat....
    Paul McLean (Leeds)

Education and the Good Society Statement

Join Compass

Mailing list

Events

High Pay Commission

How to live in the 21st Century

News filter

Tom Copley welcomes Labour's tax proposals

Monday, November 24 2008

Today Alistair Darling has an opportunity to radically alter Labour's tax policy. I hope it's an opportunity he grasps with both hands.

Reports over the weekend suggest that the two key tax changes in the Chancellor's pre-budget report will be a 2.5% cut in VAT combined with a new top rate of tax set at 45% for earnings over £150,000. Both these changes should be warmly welcomed by progressives. Some have complained that these proposals do not go far enough, but we must not underestimate the significance of what is being proposed: these policies, if implemented, will finally represent the start of a journey away from Thatcherite taxation policy. If the Government stays firm, we could be witnessing the beginning of the end of neo-liberal tax orthodoxy, if not in Britain then certainly within the Labour leadership.

To understand why these changes are so important, we need to look at the history of taxation in this country since Margaret Thatcher came to power in 1979. A key part of her economic policy was the transference of taxation away from income and on to spending. In her first budget in 1979 she cut the top and basic rates of income tax whilst increasing VAT from two rates of 8% and 12.5% to a unified rate of 15%. This put money in the pockets of the rich whilst punishing the poorest who would see little reduction in their tax bills whilst facing increasing prices. Indirect taxes, favoured by Thatcher, always hit the poor hardest.

Ever since 1979 we have seen income tax cuts, most recently by Gordon Brown in 2007. At the same time, VAT has been increased (it was raised to the present level of 17.5% in 1991), although Gordon Brown did cut the Reduced Rate of VAT to 5% in 2001.

If Alistair Darling goes ahead with these proposals, modest though they may seem, he is effectively tearing up the rules that have governed tax policy in Britain for decades.

The political significance is also huge: Labour's last three manifestos have explicitly stated that Labour will not increase income tax. One of the "gospel truths" of the new Labour project was that we could not win if the public thought we would increase income tax. Alistair Darling may be about to slay one of new Labour's sacred cows. For many in the Labour Party, myself included, it's about time.

It may be too late, of course. Because of our manifesto commitment not to raise income tax, no tax rise for top earners would come into effect until after the next election. If the Tories win it will be lost. However, although still ahead in the polls the likelihood of a Tory victory is getting slimmer by the day. My belief is that Alistair Darlings proposals in the pre-budget report will erode that Tory lead further. The new Labour spin machine that once told us income tax rises for the rich would never be popular will now be charged with selling this very idea to the public. I don't think people will need much persuading. The 10% tax debacle earlier in the year showed that most people do have a social conscience when it comes to taxation. The disgust felt towards rich City bankers, who many rightly feel are responsible for the credit crunch, has only galvanised opinion in favour of the rich paying a little more for the benefit of everyone.

We will also need to look carefully at what else Alistair Darling proposes today. I hope to see action taken to close tax loopholes - not always as simple to do as the Lib Dems like to claim but vital for fairness.

No doubt all the media's attention will be focussed on the Chancellor's income tax and VAT proposals. If he goes ahead, then economically it will be the end of "new" Labour. But it is not a return to "old" Labour, as the Tories may cry. What I hope it will mark is the beginning of real Labour. Better late than never.

Tom Copley, Chair, London Young Labour

Share using AddThis AddThis

Want to write an article like this? If you’re a Compass member you can submit your own articles and start your own debates on the Compass debates member’s section, an autonomous space for our members to initiate debate and discuss ideas.

To keep updated on the latest Compass news, please join our mailing list.

Comments

  • ««
  • «
  • »
  • »»
1 to 5 of 5
Posted by Anna-Helga (London)
on 25 November 2008, 10:37:49 AM
A very interesting article, and an accurate analysis of the shift that is occurring right now. Hopefully the economic situation, combined with Obama leading the way on redistributive policies, will further embolden the government to act in line with its principles.
Posted by Robert 
on 24 November 2008, 7:29:19 PM
Sadly the poorest have been treated worse under Labour the Welfare reforms will see perhaps 2 million disabled people languishing on £60 a week without any possibility of finding work, one way to pay off Labours debts. But do not forget when Labour came to power they offered pensioner and the disabled a 75p rise the pensioners got a bit more the disabled got nothing, Under the Tories we had a decent benefits rise under Labour it's been so low that our benefits are now about £30 less then they would have been under a Tory government. but of course perhaps people within Labour see the disabled as work shy lazy frauds.































Posted by Martyn Rosen 
on 24 November 2008, 7:06:07 PM
Your article overbrims with naive expectation, Tom. Trust me, none of what you think is happening is actually happening, none of what you think it represents is real.
Posted by Gavin (London)
on 24 November 2008, 12:57:59 PM
Excellent article Tom.
Posted by Robert (Swansea)
on 24 November 2008, 11:21:56 AM
If you believe this rubbish debt got us into this, debt will get us out.

  • ««
  • «
  • »
  • »»
1 to 5 of 5

 

Leave a comment

About you










Your comment

Please do not use HTML tags in your comment as they will be displayed as normal text.

We take no responsibility for the content of comments posted on this website, which represent the views of their authors alone.

Please enter the two words in the image below. This is an anti-spam measure designed to prove that you are a human, not a computer.