13/10/12 George Osborne's austerity is costing an extra £76bn, says IMF [The Guardian] 01/10/12 Just 50 months to tackle climate change [The Guardian] 13/09/12 Don't target this HBOS banker - the real enemy is the system that made him [The Guardian]

End the Big Six Fix

Plan B: sign the petition

In the public interest

The Good Banking Forum

Mailing list

Events

Join Compass


News filter
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo

Reflections on the year

Tuesday, December 18 2012

Our Political Positioning and Priorities Statement (below) sets out our strategic political position as well as a list of key priorities and activities proposed for the year ahead. Compass members can propose amendments to the PPPS which can then be voted on both online and at the Compass AGM on 2nd February 2013. For more information our democratic processes and the AGM click here.

We've published this as a stand alone piece on the website to allow reflection and debate and to allow interested parties to gain a better understanding of how Compass sees the current political landscape and its place in it.

Political analysis and context

The abiding contextual challenge for Compass, and all who share our desire for a good society, is both the frustration of party politics and the inspiration of extra-parliamentary change makers. The medium to long-term goal of Compass must be to help transform progressive parties and build a wider civil society alliance that is capable of changing the political beliefs and culture of our country. Indeed, Compass continues to recognise that only when a broad alliance across progressive parties is linked to an even broader alliance outside of parliament will we see the kind of transformational change in the lives of people and the planet we desire.

Formal representative democracy is going through a crisis. It is not a crisis solely of the UK or progressives but it particularly affects those that want to see fundamental change. It has at least three layers. First there is separation of power from politics and politics from power. Anglo Saxon capitalism has led the way over other variants and gone up to the level of global flows of finance and investment but democracy has failed to follow. Second, this form of capitalism has mined deep into our emotions and psyche as the consumerisation of life and society has taken an overwhelming grip on popular culture. And third the very rigid and hierarchical nature of political parties is increasingly out of step with the modern mood in which people have multiple identities and want a voice and a say in how things are done.

That doesn’t mean that party politics is redundant, far from it. Formal party politics must build up to the global or at least European level and must reach down to empower nations, cities and communities. They must also help counter the rise of selfish individualism and help foster a greater sense of common wellbeing. Finally they must let go within their own structures and allow greater freedom, liberty and democracy – not least in a way that represents the diverse nature of the country they claim to represent. There are many facets to this internal inequality but gender imbalances remain very strong.

Labour is reviving itself after a heavy defeat, much to Ed Miliband’s credit. He has cemented his leadership having taken several brave decisions on big issues such as the nature of capitalism, Leveson and, it looks like, social security. But even if things go as well as possible for Miliband, entering Downing Street with a fragile majority his leadership will likely face civil servants with their own agenda, the Treasury demanding economic orthodoxy, the Governor of the Bank of England
pressing for cuts with the backing of the bond market, a hostile media (especially if they win on Leveson), protests over transport fuel costs or other issues, a reviving Tory party under Michael Gove or Boris Johnson and then internal party opposition. To survive and lead a long term, pragmatic, transformative agenda Labour will need to amass a formidable coalition of forces and ideas inside and outside of their ranks.

The Liberal Democrats face an existential crisis, having been captured by a right-wing faction. They are polling below UKIP in some UK polls and came 8th in a recent by-election – the worst performance ever by a mainstream party. They hope something will turn up and that it can’t get any worse but they could be obliterated at the next election, from which the Tories will gain most. The radical social liberal wing in the party has yet to find its full voice and good members continue to bleed away, some to Labour but most drop out of party politics altogether. It’s essential that, in whatever form and place, the politics of radical social liberalism is kept alive and flourishes in an era where it is sorely needed.

The Green Party has changed its leader and it’s too soon to say how much Natalie Bennett can add to the success of Caroline Lucas. While their policies and analysis remain very strong there is little or no sign yet of an electoral breakthrough for the Greens. In addition there is a collective failure across the environmental sector to get sustainability back on the agenda, despite the obvious crisis we are now starting to endure.

Devolution to the Scottish Parliament, and Welsh and Northern Irish Assemblies, with their proportional voting systems, is providing space for the development of a more modern, European style of politics.

In Scotland the independence debate is providing opportunities to open up and renew left of centre politics, with progressives on both sides of the argument. The Welsh Labour Government continue to carve out clear red water for Wales without threatening a transformative agenda, while the Party of Wales can hopefully renew itself under the promising leadership of Leanne Wood. Exploring what devolution can offer, as well as a strengthened role for local authorities, will be central to fixing the failing, top down model of British politics: we need to devolve and involve!

But symptoms of this crisis of representative democracy can be seen in by-elections producing increasingly unpredictable results like Respect in Bradford West. Meanwhile, UKIP will continue to make headway, independents will win more often on councils- as they did for the police commissioner elections and turnout will continue to plummet. The National Health Action Party is standing candidates in part because they no longer see Labour as the natural party of the NHS. Could the same happen in education around academies or free schools if the main parties continue to disappoint?

But outside of these almost Victorian structures, politics for millions continues to flourish both intellectually and organisationally. Just think of the way tax justice has become a mainstream issue, now picked up by MPs such as Margaret Hodge, because the likes of UK Uncut and the Tax Justice Network made all the early running. Meanwhile 38 degrees, Transition Towns, Citizens UK, the ripples from Occupy, some trade unions and NGOs, UK Feminista, campaigning journalists and even organisations like Mumsnet will continue to take the lead alongside authors, academics and the more adventurous think tanks that know new answers are needed for the rising problems we face. But all of these organisations (and more) need a parliamentary system that goes with the grain of progressive thought and action – it is unimaginable that we can transform our country without greater ambition and force within parliament.

So there are limits to what parties can do, just as there are limits to what civil society can achieve. But politicians can and must do more – just as wider forces must join up so that we can face the crisis of capitalism and the fast emerging environmental crisis with confidence that a good society is not just desirable but feasible.

So what does this mean for Compass?

If this analysis is correct then Compass has a unique and vital role to play in securing the democratic accountability of capital, providing a compelling vision of a good society and a good life, helping progressive parties to transform themselves and building an alliance across parties and civil society.

Of course this is a massive undertaking. But Compass has great strengths: the political analysis of a good society, a growing membership and supporter base, strong links into the leadership of all the progressive political parties and a vast network of relationships with academics and campaigning organisations big and small that enable us to have a huge impact on the future of politics.

While we should be proud of successful initiatives such as Plan B and the High Pay Commission we now need to dramatically step up the scope and ambition of our activities. We cannot do everything we want – because limited resources don’t yet allow us to function in every space we need to – not least at the global or European level.

So the priorities and goals for 2013 are:

1. Re-launching Compass

The most important thing we can do all year is to unlock the huge and growing potential of our membership and supporter base. This includes local and national campaigning as well as participation, influence and support for all the work Compass plans for the next 12 months and beyond.

To these ends we will create a new look and website for Compass. An emphasis will be placed on building active local groups and Compass Youth, increasing the membership and supporter lists while developing the quality of the relationships within the organisation.

2. Gender Equality

Compass must be the change it wishes to see in the world. In what we do, how we do it and what we say – we must transform our own organisation before we can hope to transform the wider political culture of our country.

To these ends we will issue, debate and publish a ‘statement of intent’, which ties the organisation to clear goals and expectations in terms of what we do to reflect and prefigure a society based on gender equality and diversity.

3. Develop Manifestos for a Good Society

This will be the intellectual focus of Compass for the next couple of years, aimed at feeding ideas into the UK election but also at Scottish, Welsh, European and local political levels. Through a mixture of working groups, local initiatives and direct membership involvement we will produce and then campaign on a series of manifestos that makes the desirable feasible and joins up thinking and policy across the policy spectrum with a major emphasis on: a new economy, public service reform, sustainability, social security, Europe democracy and the overall vision of a good society. This work will build wherever possible on existing projects and groups such as the excellent and fast developing work of the Compass Education Group.

To these ends we will launch a manifesto building process with a major event in the new year, focus the annual conference on the manifesto and encourage local group and membership participation as fully and as far as possible in the process.

4. Build a Progressive Alliance

This will be the outward-looking organisational priority, to make a sum that is greater than its parts by joining up the party and campaign silos to create a broader movement for a good society. This good society will require thinking and action at a range of levels, our relationship with the EU, making the most of devolution, and in strengthening local democracy and the role of local authorities.

To these ends we will ensure that every activity of Compass is used to build broad and often unlikely alliances. The manifesto process will be a key platform as will local group activity. In addition Compass will conduct a large scale mapping exercise to identify and plot the progressive landscape as a key step in building a more effective political alliance.

In 12 months’ time we need to ensure our organisation is politically and financially sustainable and can meet the challenge of the new politics. Compass must take the lead where necessary, join up where possible and always prefigure the good society we desire.

Share using AddThis AddThis

Want to write an article like this? If you’re a Compass member you can submit your own articles and start your own debates on the Compass debates member’s section, an autonomous space for our members to initiate debate and discuss ideas.

To keep updated on the latest Compass news, please join our mailing list.

Comments

  • ««
  • «
  • »
  • »»
1 to 14 of 14
Posted by Andy Harvey (London)
on 11 January 2013, 6:33:06 PM
Good summary and identifies the need to create broad coalitions as essential.

What is missing is the urgent need to commit to regaining and protecting civil liberties. As the police find themselves in ever deeper trouble through their riding rough shod over our freedoms, it is now time to make this a key political priority. So including Liberty as a key partner would make a lot of sense.
Posted by David Nummey (London)
on 07 January 2013, 8:52:01 PM
I feel your reference to the Independence referendum in Scotland 'In Scotland the independence debate is providing opportunities to open up and renew left of centre politics, with progressives on both sides of the argument.' is misleading.

The first part of the sentence is reasonable: the second part is technically true, but so far from the whole truth as to be misleading for Compass members.

Far more progressives are involved with the pro-independence 'Yes Scotland' campaign than are involved with the anti-independence 'Stronger Together' campaign. The Stronger Together campaign includes whole-hearted support and funding from the Conservative party and CBI Scotland - hardly natural partners for progressives. The Yes Scotland is backed by the SNP (obviously) but also the Scottish Green Party, Scottish CND, Radical Independence, and a Labour splinter group 'Labour for Independence.'
Posted by outrider (london)
on 31 December 2012, 2:41:23 PM
Instead of widening our aims Compass I suggest we should concentrate on a few high profile things be an umbrella to promote them relentlessly
We are not a political party and therefore a local group network needs practical aims ad campaigns to work towards.

Id scrap the what it means and our goals and aims replacing with.....

What it means for Compass in terms of Policies and Goals.

Compass will become an umbrella organization and the website will encompass this.

A We will focus on a few broad aims so that our leadership is clear and direct.
These aims will be voted on and either endorsed / amended at the next large meeting / voting opportunity.

1.Climate Change. Promotion of information, consequences and targeted campaigns to change Government Policy on energy, road building. flood defences, low carbon promotion etc..

2.Renationalization of key industries e.g. rail, energy, water

3.Reformation of the Tax system: higher enforcement, employment of more staff, closing tax evasion legal loopholes and tax havens.

4.Raising a living wage

5.Housing- rent caps, building of social housing , land tax etc..


B. We will continue to work in alliance with other groups with our role in being a cohesive element in a progressive left movement. This all being within the values of gender , race and sexual and income equality


C.We will email members at least three monthly with a list of options as to our direction, and campaigns we should enhance, encourage etc..This will supplement our regular emails with leads to sign petitions, march etc..
Posted by fran (London)
on 31 December 2012, 12:35:25 PM
Hi Neal,

Season Greetings.

I'm writing because I read that the AGM will signal a change to the organization.
Whilst I have wholeheartedly backed and encouraged socialists to come together i.e. red and the Greens I still have
a massive problem with Compass working with the Lib Dems whole I feel betrayed any loyalty or even pretence to
socialist or left leaning principals by forming and continuing to prop up this Tory led government,whilst pretending that
without them it would be worse. Without them we’d have a different government!

If Compass continues to shelter the Liberals and the Greens stay unbelievably quiet about Climate Change.
(If Caroline Lucas doesn't shout out about it who is will- I think she's been really disappointing as the well known Green
voice and has decided to concentrate on other albeit important matters- effectively abstaining from her original reason for being!)
then Compass will be ineffective so I suggest again, that Lib Dems are excluded and Compass becomes a left coalition..
It is possible to be to hope that people with radical social liberal ideas like yourself should renounce their Lib Dem membership and
join the Labour Party-being cossetted by Compass just encourages their present political alliance.

It would be far more effective in my view if Compass threw its weight and energy behind giving some articulated muscle to the Green Party
and environmental movement so sadly inarticulated by any body in positions of influence.
Posted by Liz Storrar (Oxford)
on 22 December 2012, 9:15:51 AM
Encouraging summary. Hoping v much that Compass will have a conference this year. New leader of Green Party put on a good show on Any Questions last night.
Posted by Alan O'Shea (London)
on 20 December 2012, 8:47:48 PM
I agree with Stan Rosenthal that it is easier to set out broad directions (around which I think Compass has already established a strong consensus) than possible routes towards them - and there are many ideological and institutional barriers ahead - which the project of 'Building a progressive alliance' will have to address.

However I do think that more weight in the analysis has to be given to the trade unions - they are simply mentioned in a list of campaigning groups. But a left progressive movement has to have them centrally and energetically involved - especially the public sector unions, if the fight to maintain our public services is to be won. But there are also two issues which address the whole movement. One of the key sites of neoliberal successful penetration has been the workplace - the defeat on workers' bargaining power and conditions of employment and the reduction of wage levels to below subsistence level in many sectors. A fightback here is necessary to allow workers to earn their living with dignity and also to re-establish new terms for a viable welfare state. Secondly, in the Good Society proposals the co-operative/ mutualist model for working together is central and applicable across many areas of society, but is essential in the new workplace. These battles cannot be won without the unions, but the political analysis as it stands does not acknowledge this - despite the fact that the recent election of a General Secretary who is very well disposed to Compass make this an ideal moment to forge a richer alliance.
Posted by Lewis Parry (Elx)
on 20 December 2012, 3:39:28 PM
Neal,Ranulph Fienes claims to be on the coldest journey crossing the Antarctic throughout the six month polar night.
But I beg to differ.
The quest of your hardy band for red-green fusion would appear to be far longer,far darker,and far colder.
Still the plan to use non-orange book LibDems as beasts of burden on the expedition undoubtedly has some merits.They deserve it.
Beware your moral compass going skewiff in the region of the South magnetic pole.

Posted by Neal  
on 20 December 2012, 2:40:51 PM
Agree about electoral reform Laura - but will come back if the next election doesn't deliver a single party majority or not much of one. First past the post will now deliver political uncertainty. And agree with Jan re making messages more popular. This has to be a feature on 2013 for Compass
Posted by Laura Salisbury (London)
on 20 December 2012, 10:13:01 AM
As a Compass member and Green Party activist I agree that a "progressive alliance" is the way forward. Having been a member of Compass for over three years I have always felt the organisation was trying to influence the Labour leadership and their policies. But this is the wrong way round. We have to lead and Ed Miliband needs to come to us. We need to build a strong and collective force within British politics to an extent that we can no longer be ignored. Labour is decidedly unprogressive in my view. If Compass believes it has the ideology and policies for the future, we need to act as such.

The other crucial issue, which is no longer being discussed, is electoral reform. The Tories only gained 36% of the vote in the 2010 general election, but this has translated into 47% of seat in the House of Commons. Hardly a resounding mandate for privatisation of the NHS! And spare a thought for the Liberal Democrats. They gained 23% of the vote, but ended up with only 9% of seats in parliament. First past the post crushes democracy in the country, as is intended. I do not think the debate on electoral reform is now over, since the AV defeat. Far from it. It is now more crucial than ever.
Posted by Jan Hill (London)
on 20 December 2012, 9:41:32 AM
I absolutely agree with the Position and Priorities Statement. What I'd like to see in addition is a plan to disseminate Compass' ideas in the popular media so they reach the widest range of people in the UK. The power that the press has to set the agenda, define what is "normal" and unquestionable (like our version of capitalism) is huge. You can see it on the news when members of the public are asked their opinion about austerity and they reply that they know the government has to make cuts, just like people have to if they spend too much.

What Compass did with Plan B was important but it needs to become the view held by the majority.
Posted by Lewis Parry (Elx)
on 19 December 2012, 10:24:06 PM
Hey Stan!That's not too seasonal!

Even 100 fathoms under the Antarctic ice cap
being called an obstacle to alliance with the illuminati
of the green lanterns still rankles.

Wait till I reach the submerged sweet water lake in
Queen Elisabeth Land

I think the Shaggoth relics I expect to retrieve from this area
of the Montanas de la Locura will revolutionise ecological studies.
At least if H.P.Lovecraft is to be believed.
Or former Green Party co-leader David Icke.

Posted by Bret (LEAMINGTON SPA)
on 19 December 2012, 10:09:07 PM
A very good analysis, espcially with respect to the Liberal Party, I could not understand why they voted for Nick Clegg and his clearly right ring policies. I think we are governed by the arrogant privileged who so much do not understand how the rest of society lives or how to inspire people and who do not have the confidence that comes with privilege.

Posted by Giles Dickins (Lewes)
on 19 December 2012, 5:31:51 PM
Essential to work with Greens above all, given over-riding importance of addressing Climate Change.
Posted by Stan Rosenthal 
on 19 December 2012, 5:07:57 PM
A first class account of what our direction of travel should be. Can I suggest that part of the analysis should be devoted to identifying the road blocks that stand in the way of reaching our destination and working out how they can be overcome.

  • ««
  • «
  • »
  • »»
1 to 14 of 14

 

Leave a comment

About you










Your comment

Please do not use HTML tags in your comment as they will be displayed as normal text.

We take no responsibility for the content of comments posted on this website, which represent the views of their authors alone.

Please enter the two words in the image below. This is an anti-spam measure designed to prove that you are a human, not a computer.