13/10/12 George Osborne's austerity is costing an extra £76bn, says IMF [The Guardian] 01/10/12 Just 50 months to tackle climate change [The Guardian] 13/09/12 Don't target this HBOS banker - the real enemy is the system that made him [The Guardian]

End the Big Six Fix

Plan B: sign the petition

In the public interest

The Good Banking Forum

Mailing list

Events

Join Compass


News filter
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo
  • Photo

Victor Anderson - The importance of Rio 2012

Friday, March 09 2012

A major United Nations conference about the future of the planet will be taking place in Rio de Janeiro, June 20th/21st/22nd.  At the top of its agenda are 'green economy' and governance arrangements for sustainable development.  Rio 2012 will be 20 years after the Rio 1992 Earth Summit - and 40 years since the original UN Environment Conference in Stockholm.

Many NGOs around the world see Rio 2012 as a new opportunity to put a spotlight on the state of the global environment and the question of how to meet human needs in the context of a finite planet.  To some extent the issues involved have been played out through increasing dialogue and collaboration between environment and development groups.

There is also a changed political dynamic amongst the government negotiators, with countries such as China and Brazil playing a much bigger role than they did in equivalent past conferences.

However the conference is not likely to achieve as much as Rio 1992, which saw the signing of the climate change and biological diversity treaties, and gave a huge boost to the whole 'sustainable development' agenda.  This is mainly because the financial and economic crisis has, in the minds of most politicians, moved 'the environment' down the political agenda - ignoring the fact that economic progress in future is going to be limited by climate change, ecosystem deterioration, and high commodity prices reflecting pressures on resources - unless these issues are dealt with effectively, and so 'the environment' has to be addressed if economies are going to have much of a future.

Rio 2012 is expected to see significant steps forward in many areas, even though there is unlikely to be any single 'wow' decision.  Perhaps the biggest issue where Rio could make a difference is on pressing governments to raise standards for corporate reporting on firms' environmental impacts, and perhaps social impacts too.  There may also be moves to ensure a more sustainable way of managing fish stocks on the "high seas" (away from national coastlines), and there is a plan to agree to adopt a set of 'Sustainable Development Goals' for the world community.

Rio will also be a magnet for NGOs, scientists, and others to present their ideas, and some governments and companies are planning to announce commitments they intend to go ahead with regardless of whether others agree to sign up.

For more information, see the UN website on Rio:

http://www.uncsd2012.org/rio20/index.html

A key international, mainly civil society, alliance is the Green Economy Coalition:

http://www.greeneconomycoalition.org/

The Planetary Boundaries Initiative is an interesting new organisation to be launched soon:

http://planetaryboundariesinitiative.org/

Victor Anderson convenes the Compass Sustainability Panel

Share using AddThis AddThis

Want to write an article like this? If you’re a Compass member you can submit your own articles and start your own debates on the Compass debates member’s section, an autonomous space for our members to initiate debate and discuss ideas.

To keep updated on the latest Compass news, please join our mailing list.

Comments

  • ««
  • «
  • »
  • »»
1 to 5 of 5
Posted by Brian Lynch 
on 14 March 2012, 10:05:13 AM
Can't really disagree with your comments Lee, especially on climate emissions which are linked to foreign policy. To sustain the american dream, oceans of oil are still required, and free markets destroy natural resources. I also believe that radical approaches need to take place with our relationship to the US. Craven obedience, and "junior partner" status for the UK is ridiculous. If we are to be a so called champion of green technologies and carbon reduction. This is going to impact on the "special relationship" i look forward to a positive response from politicians.
Posted by Lee (mediterranean)
on 14 March 2012, 5:34:10 AM
Thanks anon for making the point so well. This issue is not confined, of course, to the environment. In all spheres of international affairs, the USA exempts itself from the standards it claims for others. It murders innocent civilians in the middle east and its response is that it stands for human rights. It condemns terrorism and carries out the worst acts of terrorism on the planet. It claims the right to have anyone in the world extradited to face charges in US courts but has warned that it will use force to free any American charged overseas. It rails against China's trade policy while being the largest subsider of exports in the world, constantly manipulating the dollar exchange rate to try to get unfair advantage, and using wars of aggression in the middle east and central asia to cut China off from voluntarily concluded oil supply. And on climate change, it refuses to accept that any international regulation of carbon emissions applies to the USA. It is the Global Hypocrite Par Excellence. This derives from its belief that America's Manifest Destiny is guided by God, a belief that does not belong to the 21st Century and constantly threatens any prospect of world peace.

Britain's single biggest problem is "The Special Relationship". While Cameron is not quite the obsequious creep that Blair was and is, he too has fallen for this delusion, rushing to lick the feet of a failed President that has betrayed those who voted for him, made fools of the Nobel Peace Prize, intensified torture and the destruction of civilians overseas, introduced a policy of state assassination against his own citizens, and suspended habeas corpus. Britain will never regain its world respect or its trading status while it supports such a regime. The problem is that Newlabour is even more devoted to American hegemony than the Tories who do try to maintain a certain dignity.

Compass, unsurprisingly, would never dream of having this kind of debate. It would rather focus on domestic parish pump issues such as those appearing week after week on its front page. However much it believes that it challenges the status quo, Compass in the end stands by the political establishment, and would never challenge a doctrine as holy as the Special Relationship. You wont find any debate here about Britain supporting US attacks on Libya, or in future on Syria and Iran. Even Iraq is hardly mentioned. The Compass good society doesnt extend beyond the confines of the St Johns Wood drawing rooms in which its narratives are composed.

Posted by  
on 13 March 2012, 3:44:24 PM
Sorry, Victor, but I have to agree with Lee. Rio 2012 seems destined to be another hugely expensive jamboree which covers up the total failure of Durban and the two preceding conferences. The fact that the 2012 CCC will be in Qatar, the country with the highest per capita carbon emissions in the world, sums it up. I do think that so long as the environmental NGOs continue to play the game and start refusing to participate until the USA stops wrecking the negotiations, nothing will change.
Posted by lee  (mediterranean)
on 13 March 2012, 9:02:03 AM
Dear Lewis

Given that Compass has sunk into the dismal swamp (where it spends much of its time, I notice), How about a poem to cheer us up. Maybe the poem could refer to the entirely unsurprising announcement from Ummuna (the fabulous, british obama, first black UK PM in waiting, doyen of the blueabour right) that he is even more pro-City than the Tories, and to confirm that, reveals that his role models are Michael Heseltine and Peter Mandelson. He even did Peter the compliment of saying he is 'totally relaxed about bosses getting huge pay'..... just in case we dont believe that he is now to the right of the Tories.

httpCOLON/wwwDOTmirrorDotcoDOTuk/news/uk-news/chuka-umunna-totally-relaxed-about-huge-758545

Doesnt seem to bother Neal. Maybe he is totally relaxed with huge pay-outs too ? So maybe an ode to being Totally Relaxed.
Posted by Lee (mediterranean)
on 09 March 2012, 7:15:38 PM
Talk about ignoring the ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM. Obama has now wrecked three climate change conferences (starting with Stockholm, which he wrecked with the help of Ed Miliband) and has made it clear he will continue to do so. Rio will be Obama wrecked conference Number 4, because the Europeans, especially the UK, doesnt have the balls to stand up to him and join with the rest of the world.

  • ««
  • «
  • »
  • »»
1 to 5 of 5

 

Leave a comment

About you










Your comment

Please do not use HTML tags in your comment as they will be displayed as normal text.

We take no responsibility for the content of comments posted on this website, which represent the views of their authors alone.

Please enter the two words in the image below. This is an anti-spam measure designed to prove that you are a human, not a computer.